You see, even though I will never agree with Mr. Hubbs on the subject of vaccinations, there are certain things we might be able to agree upon, and therefore I have extended the olive branch so to speak to determine what Mr. Hubbs would think about me renaming this blog to remove his name from both the URL as well as from the title. He has expressed "concern" about this blog using his name in the past, and recent events have made me question whether it is appropriate.
Of course in return I would hope that Mr. Hubbs would agree to do the same for his own blog. Perhaps he could rename it to "ProVaccineBabyKiller" or something equally as clever, but I'll leave that up to him. I'm not talking about removing existing content nor am I speaking about further blog posts - the only point of discussion here is the removal of the name "Lowell Hubbs" from the blog name and URL. It is possible that Mr. Hubbs would like to use his name on his own blog which is fine by me.... that is his call.
I left my comment on his blog several days ago but it has yet to be published, so as of now I have no idea what his opinion on the matter might actually be. I would envision this blog transforming into a general blog about vaccine conspiracy theorists rather than simply focusing upon Mr. Hubbs, but before I take any action I would like to get Mr. Hubbs' opinion.
Now it is possible he simply has not read the comment yet, and it is possible he really doesn't have a response, but I'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt in the hopes he will reach out to me and let his opinion be known. That is part of the reasoning behind this post since I know he does read this blog so I'm sure he will (eventually) see this post and be able to offer his opinion.
So with all of that said, if anyone has any ideas for a new name for the blog, by all means leave them in the comments.
Edit (07/27/12): The blog has officially been renamed to The Vaccine Conspiracy Theorist and the new url is http://vaccineconspiracytheorist.blogspot.com/. Unfortunately this means old bookmarks, favorites, shortcuts, and links will no longer function properly, but in time I hope those who have visited the blog in the past will be able to find it again.
I believe that it was an asinine and chicken shit thing to do, having put (my name), someone elses name in that url; when you have had no identity yourself. I think you should remove it. It really wouldn't matter at this point, as my name is endlessly all over that blog anyway. It would still redirect to that sick blog, the minute my name was entered into a search. Why would and should it even be up to me enough to go through the work of changing my blog name and the url?
ReplyDeleteIt wouldn't make much of a difference. Some, but not a lot. There is or must be some sort of reason for this game you are playing here with this. Your name is not Costner, Possibly a known nickname, and you have denied that it your last name is Matthews. Yet you were blogging with that name and apparently an alias in 2007; is that not a bit odd? No such name exists in any for of a search, and you know it, so you are yet anonymous anyway. That, unless people around you have figured out who you are, and it perhaps is embarrasing. I could not begin to fathom the depths of your twisted mind, Costner; nor likly even try. There is a reason you are asking for what you are, and it is clearly NOT about good will.
I am taking it under further advisement, but see no known real advantage to you in changing; as you dont apparently exist, anyway.
The point is Mr. Hubbs, that I have made you an offer, and now you are trying to find excuses on why you won't do the same. That's fine - I'm going to change the name of this blog anyway because it is the right thing to do. If you wish to continue using my "name" on your blog, then I suppose that is your choice, but you have to admit it would be rather hypocritical of you to do so.
DeleteThis is no game Mr. Hubbs, I'm being sincere and I am going to change the name. It really doesn't have anything to do with me, and I could care less if you plaster my name all of your blog and website, I just thought it would be nice if you would return the favor. So yes Mr. Hubbs this is about good will... there are no strings attached and I'm not sure how this could benefit me by removing your name from the title.
Ok alias Costner, so lets focus on this with a bit of actual honesty. Just because the Feds/DOJ took your now gone page down, and gave you a warning as to your blog and what was going on with it, including the url and the impersonation; thus you want me to comply with your request. Why did not the feds go after me? Correct answer, because they clearly know that you are the aggressor and the troubler maker. They know as well that my blog is only on the deffensive mode as to defensing myself in regard to your attacks; and as to what I know and believe is truth, correct, and fact. They, those that took your said blog page down; they obviously know as well what your true identity is; do you actually think they do not? And they obviously know the url to my blog does not contain your real name. Thats right, I have the means to investigation of matters, you would have no clue about.
ReplyDeleteYou still have zero actual identity, and you continue to attack me personally and use reference to my name personally in every blog page. Yet, and in all of that which you do; you yet have the stinking and putred adacity to refer to me as a hypocrite. My blog never had nor contained any real identity for you; so thus the point and issue you raise is and remains irrelevant. You as well still remain the completely arrogant and senseless biggot; you always were.
So for the record again, the real reason goes back to the fact that the Feds/DOJ took down your said and known blog page, after you arrogantly and ignorantly plastered and promoting those false charges that I had nothing to do with, nor with me. You did that said blog page with as well, all of your own added, false, and unjustified claims against me added into it. You know the page, Costner; it no longer exists here in this blog. All proving once again, what a bitter and personally attacking and desperately going after anything and angry person you really are. That, over the truth, the facts, and the real science; that you know you do not have. Who has it? I do.
And so thus it, your whole blog became flagged by the DOJ. So then, they in addition, thus realized that you as well were doing several things illegally on your previous blog in regard to impersonation, and likely more than that. It appears you were likely were even threatened with federal charges by the DOJ; to keep doing what you were. That’s what it took. So even after that you now again Costner, create a new blog with the carry over of the same 80 plus pages of personal attack, only under a different blog name and a different url; only difference is that it is without my name in the url. Who's fault is all that; mine, or yours?
Again, that is some real personally attacking hatred of truth and fact you have going on there, alias Costner! That, is an OBSESSION, with ONE person. And THAT, is clearly and obviously, SICK!
You aren’t at all in any major and intentional denial are you, there; Costner? Not at all. You have Gorski, Orac, and Left/Right, Mnookin; and all of them beat by 100 miles; with your mindless in denial and to much to lose, sickness. As a fact; not even THEY would not continue on the trail you have been and persistently stoop to the psychotic and mindless level that you have; of and as to what you do and claim to.
What on God's green Earth are you talking about Lowell? The "feds" or the "DOJ" didn't have anything to do with me moving this blog, and I somehow doubt they care what I name the blog... it isn't illegal to post a blog with a URL named after another person.
ReplyDeleteBesides - if you visit the old URL you will note I still control that site and it has a message directing users here. So your information and your conspiracy theories are flat out incorrect (as usual).
As far as blog posts, I've never removed a single post since I've started this blog so I'm not sure what you are referring to there. Most of these posts are also found in Google cache so if you think something was removed it should be pretty easy for you to find it. Sorry Mr. Hubbs - you're still dead wrong.
Do you really think the "feds" would tell someone to rename a blog? Honestly? Do you think they would give someone time to do it on their own schedule rather than just putting up a takedown notice like happened to your website?
Come on Mr. Hubbs, even you aren't that stupid are you? I reached out to YOU directly and asked your opinion on whether I should change the name because it was the right thing to do, and because many of my posts relate to vaccine conspiracies in general rather than just your crazy ideas. Thus the decision to move this blog was mine and mine alone, and I've kept the old URL active with the hopes of shutting it down eventually... but now you have me wondering if perhaps I should just keep it in place since it proves your little theory is dead wrong.
Seriously Mr. Hubbs - where do you come up with this stuff? Do you just spend your days dreaming up stories that make you feel better about yourself? Honestly it is almost sad how misinformed you really are.
Go ahead and keep the url with my name in it and see what happens; I dare you to prove me wrong. It is exactly as I said it is and was. I don't give a damn if you change that url or not, because it all will eventually redirect to my name anyway. It will change little to nothing, and it actually ruined my counter blog because now my pages do not have an active link in them that correspond to your being replied to pages. So no; I don't care and would have actually prefered that it remained the same as it was, simply because of that reason and issue.
ReplyDeleteThe fact that you make denial of that page the feds took down, and you know that they did; makes you the biggest psychopathic style liar there ever was. What a twisted man; you are a man, right? I went right to your blog that night and seen that page; are you telling me I never seen what was there? All that and with all your personal attack comments about how you knew it and warned about that I would lose it one day and end up, whatever. All mindless bullshit, Costner; every bit of it; but then false discreditation is what you must maintain no matter how sick the attacks; because you have nothing else in honesty to counter the truth information with, but personal attack.
You simply can not and refuse conduct an honest debate on any issue at all. All that ever transpires is more of your endless denial, lack of critical thinking ability, and intellectual dishonesty, and of course more of your obvious to any thinking person, endless lying bullshit. You can not tolerate the truth nor anyone whatsoever that puts that truth forward. How either completely lying, or entirely delusional, does a person have to be to conduct what you do?
Have a nice day; and ask yourself what you are really seeing, when you look in that mirror. You are proud of that? Really?
Mr. Hubbs, I know I said I wouldn't publish any more of your comments, but I'm making an exception here since I want to directly respond to your claims.
DeleteFirst, the old "lowellhubbs.blogspot.com" URL is still active. You can visit it yourself and verify it, thus I have no idea why you think the "Feds" shut it down or why they would care. You really think you're that important? You really think this blog is that important? I'd think they might have better things to do... like fighting terrorism and dealing with the Middle East, but hey - whatever.
Second, you have been complaining about me using your name on this blog for almost two years. You have complained about it dozens upon dozens of times, so when I finally decide to change it and I modify the primary URL... now you are complaining. What exactly would make you happy Mr. Hubbs? I try to do you a favor and give you what you want and you are right back to complaining... it seems even when you get your way you still aren't happy. Unbelievable.
Now as to this sentence: "I went right to your blog that night and seen that page; are you telling me I never seen what was there?"
First of all, I'm not sure what you "seen", and as grammatically incorrect as that sentence is, I still have no idea what you're talking about. I posted a comment to your blog at least a week before making the change to this blog so you might think it was obvious it was my choice to rename the blog. I sought your input, and you started complaining and back-peddling, so I went ahead and created this new blog and transitioned the blog pages to it. The old blog still exists and is merely a placeholder.
So Mr. Hubbs I have no idea what you "seen". I can only imagine this is another one of your fairy tales where you pretend something exists that really doesn't, thus I might suggest you adjust whatever medications (legal or otherwise) you happen to be on.
Oh and to answer your question - I'm quite satisfied with what I see in the mirror. Hope you feel the same.
Lowell,
ReplyDeleteAfter working with you at Ellison’s through Labor Ready, reading through this blog, including your own blog and website, I believe that you’re a psychopathic man with some kind of a vendetta full of hate towards the public, your employers and co-workers.
One only has to look at why you’re no longer welcomed at Ellison’s, and got the entire Labor Ready contract pulled after it was your razor blades found in the meat product production line, forcing Ellison’s to shut down all production for clean-up and investigation.
It appears that in addition to your prior legal troubles, you are back at it again with an active warrant out of Brule Co, for violations of SDCL 22-24-1.1, 22-24-1.2, 22-32-20, 22-34-1 for vandalism; defecating and urinating inside a law enforcement vehicle.
I'm still working at Labor Ready going to Mitchell daily, where have you been??? Are you afraid of Alfred??? He won’t hurt you because he has priorities and doesn't want to go to jail over you - you're not worth it! Grow up a little…
Big Jim - I'm sure you understand just because someone says something it doesn't make it true. I'm reluctant to accuse Mr. Hubbs of any nefarious activity without some proof, so I hope you'll understand that I take what you have written with a grain of salt.
DeleteI should also note that normally I'd say this has nothing to do with vaccines and vaccine conspiracy theories, however if what you claim is true it surely goes to character and calls into question the mental stability of Mr. Hubbs. That said, I won't be accusing Mr. Hubbs of any crimes without some form of corroboration.
Hope you understand, and thanks for contributing.
One final note - I find it incredibly coincidental that "Big Jim" posts a comment merely minutes after Mr. Hubbs, especially considering the time of night they were posted. I suspect this is yet another example of Mr. Hubbs using a sockpuppet account to make claims which he will later complain about, which is why I wrote my comment about not trusting those accusations until there is more evidence.
DeleteYes I'm sure he will deny posting the comment as he typically does, but I also imagine if I refused to publish it that he would complain... so I can't win either way.
Either way I find Mr. Hubbs' tactics shameful. It is too bad he has to play these little games rather than trying to defend his statements about vaccines, but I've learned long ago that when anti-vaxxers are pressed for science they often resort to childish antics and any attempt to shift the conversation to themselves or their self-proclaimed status as martyrs. Sad.
Sorry Mr. Hubbs but you are still banned from commenting and will remain so until you man-up and admit you have been attempting to manipulate the conversation by posting under various sockpuppet IDs including "anonymous".
ReplyDeleteYou apparently forgot you were posting comments as anonymous when you posted a comment telling me about a "response" on your blog (the exact same type comment you leave every time you create a new blog page), and then minutes later using this same name you started speaking in the third person and whining that I didn't publish comments from "Hubbs".
This is why I refuse to publish your nonsense. You can't even be honest about who is posting your silly comments, so I have no reason to suspect you would ever try to be honest about the comment itself.
P.S. - Complaining as "anonymous" that I refused to publish a comment you submitted as Lowell Hubbs probably isn't the best way to make me think you are a unique individual. It also might help if you stopped using the grammatically incorrect phrase of "to much to lose" in almost every other comment. Brilliant.